Hanwen Li vs Plamen Milushev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L W L L L
Form
W W L W W W L W L LHead-2-Head: Li 1 - 0 Milushev
They have played 3 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Milushev winning 1. The last match between Li and Milushev was at the M15 Skopje, 09-06-2021, First, Clay with Hanwen Li getting the victory 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hanwen Li | 1 |
| Plamen Milushev | 0 |
M15 Skopje(09-06-2021)
6
4
6
7
6
4
| Li | Stats | Milushev |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 710 | Ranking | N/A |
| 524 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 22 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 50% (78-78) | Career Total W/L | 59% (86-61) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 |
Stats 
Hanwen Li
Player
Plamen Milushev
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
66%
(
33 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:55:0 | Average Match Time | 2:55:0 |
| 51% (52/102) | 1st Serve % | 57% (58/101) |
| 77% (40/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (42/58) |
| 66% (33/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (20/43) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
| 39% (39/101) | Return Points Win % | 28% (29/102) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hanwen Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Changli Zhang
Player
Hanwen Li
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
45
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linang Xiao
Player
Hanwen Li
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Hanwen Li
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanwen Li
Player
Thanapet Chanta
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Hanwen Li
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Hanwen Li
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Hanwen Li
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
36%
(
28 of
78)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Hanwen Li
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hanwen Li
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Hanwen Li
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
16
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
23%
(
20 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
18 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Plamen Milushev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Ribero
Player
Plamen Milushev
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Player
Plamen Milushev
88%
(
44 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Plamen Milushev
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Plamen Milushev
Player
Dinko Dinev
38%
(
30 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 6-7(2) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Plamen Milushev
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Plamen Milushev
Player
Saveliy Ivanov
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (78/78) | Win/Loss | 59% (86/61) |
| 49% (171/175) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (187/144) |
| 49% (1521/1606) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1585/1422) |
| 53% (59/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) |
| 43% (19/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (75/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 427 | Aces Total | 61 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 466 | Total Double Faults | 65 |
| 1:39:34 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 539.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 305.01 |
| 55% (5294/9667) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1025/1744) |
| 66% (3496/5294) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (633/1025) |
| 47% (2049/4372) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (330/719) |
| 44% (439/1008) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (60/123) |
| 41% (3940/9676) | Return Points Win % | 36% (557/1529) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31% (4/9) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (74/66) | Futures W/L | 59% (86/61) |
| 51% (74/146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (84/144) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 44% (15/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (15/22) |
| 58% (22/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (22/38) |
| 88% (72/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (85/75) |
| 13% (72/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (85/10) |
| 18% (84/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (62/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
